Abstract
Background: This study focuses on the apple image,which has become a visual symbol with multiple meanings throughout the history of art. As the most common fruit, e apple continuously generates diverse meanings in artistic works. It goes beyond being a natural object, undergoing constant reconfiguration and reinterpretation across religious narratives, mythological tales, and secular imagery. It demonstrates symbolic significance across time, space, and media. Objective: By interpreting apple imagery in artworks, this study explores how apples transition from “natural objects“ to “meaning carriers“ embedded with religious doctrines, mythological systems, and secular cultural interpretations. Methods: This paper analyzes the meanings associated in apple imagery using Peirce’s triadic model of symbols—“iconic symbols—indexical symbols—symbolic symbols.“Analysis shows that the boundary between creating apple imagery and interpreting its meaning is continually challenged, resulting in the ongoing renewal of conveyed significance. Results: The study demonstrates that apple imagery is not merely objective artistic representation but, through a step-by-step process of “description-analysis-interpretation,“ reveals its inherent meaning as a symbol of the zeitgeist, ideology, and visual communication. Conclusion: Peirce’s triadic model guides art historical research in shifting from representation theory to semiosis theory. The “symbolic interpretation chain“ perspective offers a new interpretive path for understanding how visual elements in artworks generate meaning.
References
Akbar, M. A. (2005). Religious painting: The Garden of Eden. China Religion, (8), 73.
Blythe, B. (2018). Apples to apples: Forbidden fruit in Petronius’s Cena Trimalchionis. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 148(2), 393–419. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26695498
Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). Unlimited semiosis. In A dictionary of media and communication. Oxford University Press.
Che, H. M. (2019). An iconological study of the image of Hermes in the Renaissance (Master’s thesis). Shandong Normal University. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=iMwhGHIyCLZbrO2e0w3A6hCcrLJWRyCwW-1P8jBNnkWSzcOFHhYKNB1lX c2bifQPMt68m2mxIOKcxj1TfU6EOOzXsFGJq5rOEi8Z0JIRdm7_jPm5F9TITo-CwwhlLYFe4jnNucFGVMlFZcrbO4FNSBpQnn OlsY7exaHzOe0wKS-xm6_9uJHgDg==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
Chen, Y. L. (2007). A brief analysis of Cézanne’s still life paintings. Art Education, (12), 123. https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2pqLHSaiIVH_WFm3UeoreOez6VGMb23gHt-FgbV-jxjY_OWe TvZkxHwhjJqUFShpbMouOjj_KbUkrawzthoKbqZNvFCnR3S_2Sz_EmfvqcjfsH9eXGjKc3ZpUKzRIcnHXGYDaEPK4SOafCB 7Z2FaRGNBOMM_f8IEZ5d-RiWC6JYNA==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS
Chen, Y. Q. (2014). Visual design research on the transformation of apple shape into schematic symbols. In Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2014 China (Wuxi) International Design Expo High-end Forum and the 3rd International Conference on Redesigning Design Education: Philosophical Concepts (pp. 87–89).
Hang, D. (2013). The iconological and semiotic turn: Based on the perspective of art history research. Social Scientist, (11), 132–135. https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2qu9ETSI3VpMGf7sWs61qjZ_UMPK7ohbKtaRKpaoVwk8gEcS B-ls86OY3eFXMqwSHgcIpjv0tiBQNnHzgDGviE4XtPh26kHj1OVWt_kJbBwTfuZWLFq7H1vnOHHoGZXW9VcCozW2OJAH 4-w0dSyUuXG_vVFtZSLoQWIlRfTRGyRkg==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS
Hao, X. H. (2013). Inspirational creativity of logo design symbols and brand culture. Packaging Engineering, 34(6), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2013.06.029
Jiang, X. Y. (2018). Surrealist painting from the perspective of spirit and philosophy. Popular Literature and Art, (12), 105–106. https://doi.org/10.20112/j.cnki.issn1007-5828.2018.12.161
Li, J. P. (2011). The eternal apple: The painting art of Paul Cézanne. Art Panorama, (12), 75.
https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2ouQ4-LXEnNHFCW_7EAzuPF4WjijAHDmlxyXexnHqC4j2K ARbUrB14kOZINcPkGXmUvAv_TKk21ZGke9goG1sAhI08-8kwW4MVcWZJhfRyuN2PzTrW7vdk1dTRsRWXhUIFl7UVuwt G7UlzQJYKxIeDknyPYDpPhRp-0c3CdoGcX5A==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS
Li, Y. (2021). The appleness of the apple: D. H. Lawrence’s depiction of Cézanne and its enlightenment to intermedia research. Zhejiang Social Sciences, (11), 132–140, 160–161. https://doi.org/10.14167/j.zjss.2021.11.015
Li, Y. N. (2025). Research on the operation mechanism of artistic symbols in Andy Warhol (Master’s thesis). Guizhou Normal University. https://doi.org/10.27048/d.cnki.ggzsu.2025.000462
Ma, W. Z. (2017). Reproduction and difference: Color application and meaning expression in Andy Warhol’s artworks. Hundred Schools in Arts, 33(5), 228–230
https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2rUWnEwDTbs9ULxdC7N_XbCRwg0xGzENJ2Gu4lWa-eg-562 HxTQr_WZPGQN4hlHCxnzFRzma7tVxqsGsnO9IblRQ8DRgNiOVk_m08pVDvmt8hOoJdMQKY6Q9Sm_kDjVBhsrdiaupBg CTNus-fDtR1kYARm-43E12CNQKFSbzrdqAQ==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS
Tian, H. L. (2023). Semiotics-based research on linguistic ideology: Progress from “directivity” to “signification”. Contemporary Linguistics, 25(2), 300–316.
https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2qzNY23q1F82RZiKBBBy4WlGO1jKG5tfBTDoTPwZTs8QUUG HaMzAEN87l_BLANiV760xa9gFm2E6oh3vMiYFKdqisUXVz1Uc87WzUsVi0xTNwhItQidDKM6RoyThrMGhL4v7qOu4bQ3 WDQ9olRGHvEbptgRN6pbH3Yvm-RjqjVx4g==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS
Zhang, J. Q. (2019). Paris’s golden apple: The origin of war. China Science & Technology, (1), 100–104. https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2oku-vi5RDe19NXHKY3RmAYfz8d-PuW1rJMObI4w7pAjaQW ZnlIdYFbrL-D5F8FK4YURtOklMJ6SADQXfRe5I8iylf8xShxdFlHf9kznu16ImqV70sZO2asQdMAAkdWSNFrUr47jztlQqd-4W NoQ_NYyrnv1PQj3SSS6UF4YjnSAw==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS
Zhao, X. Z. (2016). Is “unlimited semiosis” really unlimited? A re-discussion on Peirce’s interpretant theory. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 43(6), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2016.06.020

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Journal of Global Arts Studies.
