From Eden to iPhone: The Image of the "Apple" in Peirce’s Semiotic Perspective
PDF

Keywords

Apple imagery; Peircean semiotics; Visual symbol; Meaning evolution; Signification

How to Cite

From Eden to iPhone: The Image of the "Apple" in Peirce’s Semiotic Perspective. (2026). Journal of Global Arts Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.23112/jgas26033101

Abstract

Background:  This study focuses on the apple image,which has become a visual symbol with  multiple  meanings  throughout  the  history  of  art.  As  the  most  common  fruit, e  apple continuously generates diverse meanings in artistic works. It goes beyond being a natural object, undergoing constant reconfiguration and reinterpretation across religious narratives, mythological tales,    and    secular    imagery.    It    demonstrates    symbolic    significance    across    time,    space, and media. Objective: By interpreting apple imagery in artworks, this study explores how apples transition  from  “natural  objects“  to  “meaning  carriers“  embedded  with  religious  doctrines, mythological  systems,  and  secular  cultural  interpretations.  Methods:   This  paper  analyzes  the meanings   associated   in    apple   imagery    using   Peirce’s    triadic   model   of    symbols—“iconic symbols—indexical  symbols—symbolic  symbols.“Analysis  shows  that  the  boundary  between creating apple  imagery  and  interpreting  its  meaning is  continually  challenged,  resulting  in  the ongoing renewal of conveyed significance. Results: The study demonstrates that apple imagery is not    merely     objective    artistic     representation    but,     through    a     step-by-step    process     of “description-analysis-interpretation,“  reveals  its  inherent  meaning  as  a  symbol  of  the  zeitgeist, ideology,  and  visual   communication.  Conclusion:  Peirce’s  triadic  model   guides  art  historical research in shifting from representation theory to semiosis theory. The  “symbolic interpretation chain“  perspective  offers   a  new  interpretive  path  for  understanding  how  visual  elements  in artworks generate meaning.

PDF

References

Akbar, M. A. (2005). Religious painting: The Garden of Eden. China Religion, (8), 73.

Blythe, B. (2018). Apples to apples: Forbidden fruit in Petronius’s Cena Trimalchionis. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 148(2), 393–419. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26695498

Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). Unlimited semiosis. In A dictionary of media and communication. Oxford University Press.

Che, H. M. (2019). An iconological study of the image of Hermes in the Renaissance (Master’s thesis). Shandong Normal University. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=iMwhGHIyCLZbrO2e0w3A6hCcrLJWRyCwW-1P8jBNnkWSzcOFHhYKNB1lX c2bifQPMt68m2mxIOKcxj1TfU6EOOzXsFGJq5rOEi8Z0JIRdm7_jPm5F9TITo-CwwhlLYFe4jnNucFGVMlFZcrbO4FNSBpQnn OlsY7exaHzOe0wKS-xm6_9uJHgDg==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Chen, Y. L. (2007). A brief analysis of Cézanne’s still life paintings. Art Education, (12), 123. https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2pqLHSaiIVH_WFm3UeoreOez6VGMb23gHt-FgbV-jxjY_OWe TvZkxHwhjJqUFShpbMouOjj_KbUkrawzthoKbqZNvFCnR3S_2Sz_EmfvqcjfsH9eXGjKc3ZpUKzRIcnHXGYDaEPK4SOafCB 7Z2FaRGNBOMM_f8IEZ5d-RiWC6JYNA==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS

Chen, Y. Q. (2014). Visual design research on the transformation of apple shape into schematic symbols. In Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2014 China (Wuxi) International Design Expo High-end Forum and the 3rd International Conference on Redesigning Design Education: Philosophical Concepts (pp. 87–89).

Hang, D. (2013). The iconological and semiotic turn: Based on the perspective of art history research. Social Scientist, (11), 132–135. https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2qu9ETSI3VpMGf7sWs61qjZ_UMPK7ohbKtaRKpaoVwk8gEcS B-ls86OY3eFXMqwSHgcIpjv0tiBQNnHzgDGviE4XtPh26kHj1OVWt_kJbBwTfuZWLFq7H1vnOHHoGZXW9VcCozW2OJAH 4-w0dSyUuXG_vVFtZSLoQWIlRfTRGyRkg==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS

Hao, X. H. (2013). Inspirational creativity of logo design symbols and brand culture. Packaging Engineering, 34(6), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2013.06.029

Jiang, X. Y. (2018). Surrealist painting from the perspective of spirit and philosophy. Popular Literature and Art, (12), 105–106. https://doi.org/10.20112/j.cnki.issn1007-5828.2018.12.161

Li, J. P. (2011). The eternal apple: The painting art of Paul Cézanne. Art Panorama, (12), 75.

https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2ouQ4-LXEnNHFCW_7EAzuPF4WjijAHDmlxyXexnHqC4j2K ARbUrB14kOZINcPkGXmUvAv_TKk21ZGke9goG1sAhI08-8kwW4MVcWZJhfRyuN2PzTrW7vdk1dTRsRWXhUIFl7UVuwt G7UlzQJYKxIeDknyPYDpPhRp-0c3CdoGcX5A==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS

Li, Y. (2021). The appleness of the apple: D. H. Lawrence’s depiction of Cézanne and its enlightenment to intermedia research. Zhejiang Social Sciences, (11), 132–140, 160–161. https://doi.org/10.14167/j.zjss.2021.11.015

Li, Y. N. (2025). Research on the operation mechanism of artistic symbols in Andy Warhol (Master’s thesis). Guizhou Normal University. https://doi.org/10.27048/d.cnki.ggzsu.2025.000462

Ma, W. Z. (2017). Reproduction and difference: Color application and meaning expression in Andy Warhol’s artworks. Hundred Schools in Arts, 33(5), 228–230

https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2rUWnEwDTbs9ULxdC7N_XbCRwg0xGzENJ2Gu4lWa-eg-562 HxTQr_WZPGQN4hlHCxnzFRzma7tVxqsGsnO9IblRQ8DRgNiOVk_m08pVDvmt8hOoJdMQKY6Q9Sm_kDjVBhsrdiaupBg CTNus-fDtR1kYARm-43E12CNQKFSbzrdqAQ==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS

Tian, H. L. (2023). Semiotics-based research on linguistic ideology: Progress from “directivity” to “signification”. Contemporary Linguistics, 25(2), 300–316.

https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2qzNY23q1F82RZiKBBBy4WlGO1jKG5tfBTDoTPwZTs8QUUG HaMzAEN87l_BLANiV760xa9gFm2E6oh3vMiYFKdqisUXVz1Uc87WzUsVi0xTNwhItQidDKM6RoyThrMGhL4v7qOu4bQ3 WDQ9olRGHvEbptgRN6pbH3Yvm-RjqjVx4g==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS

Zhang, J. Q. (2019). Paris’s golden apple: The origin of war. China Science & Technology, (1), 100–104. https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2FByMehzK2oku-vi5RDe19NXHKY3RmAYfz8d-PuW1rJMObI4w7pAjaQW ZnlIdYFbrL-D5F8FK4YURtOklMJ6SADQXfRe5I8iylf8xShxdFlHf9kznu16ImqV70sZO2asQdMAAkdWSNFrUr47jztlQqd-4W NoQ_NYyrnv1PQj3SSS6UF4YjnSAw==&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS

Zhao, X. Z. (2016). Is “unlimited semiosis” really unlimited? A re-discussion on Peirce’s interpretant theory. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 43(6), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2359.2016.06.020

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Journal of Global Arts Studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.