Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Background: Nature is not merely an external landscape; rather, it participates in emotional regulation and physical and mental restoration through multiple sensory stimuli, such as plants, scents, light and shadow, and spatial dynamics. The relaxation and restoration that people gain in nature arise from a deep perceptual resonance between the body and the environment. Ecological aesthetics, the biophilia hypothesis, attention restoration theory, and stress reduction theory together indicate that natural healing is not an incidental aesthetic experience, but rather a psychophysical manifestation of the long‑term symbiotic relationship between humans and nature. Purpose: This study aims to explain how natural imagery, through visual translation, transforms light and shadow, water ripples, vegetation, the sensation of wind, airiness, and spatial rhythm into a visible and associative visual language, and to discuss how it evokes natural perception, relieves emotional stress, and encourages direct contact with real nature during viewing. Methods: This study combines a literature review, theoretical interpretation, and image‑based case analyses. It integrates ecological aesthetics, the biophilia hypothesis, attention restoration theory, and stress reduction theory, and conducts a comparative analysis of the author’s creative work, Forest Whispers, and two additional cases of natural imagery. Results: The study finds that the healing quality of natural imagery does not arise from the direct representation of natural landscapes, but is instead generated through the interaction of embodied experience, sensory memory, aesthetic projection, and visual order. Visual elements such as water ripples, grass leaves, light spots, transparent layers, blue‑green hues, and open space can transform auditory, tactile, visual, and spatial experiences in nature into image cues with an emotional orientation. Conclusion: The value of visual healing lies neither in replacing real nature nor in creating an insular image‑based sense of comfort, but in using natural imagery to open a perceptual channel between humans and nature and to guide viewers toward rediscovering the psychophysical significance of direct contact with real nature.
References
Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249‑259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
Bratman, G. N., Anderson, C. B., Berman, M. G., Cochran, B., de Vries, S., Flanders, J., Folke, C., Frumkin, H., Gross, J. J., Hartig, T., Kahn, P. H., Kuo, M., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Lindahl, T., Meyer‑Lindenberg, A., Mitchell, R., Ouyang, Z., Roe, J., ... Daily, G.C. (2019). Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances, 5(7), Article eaax0903. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0903
Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2025). Benefits of nature imagery and visual art in healthcare contexts: A view from empirical aesthetics. Buildings, 15(7), Article 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15071027
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Garling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109‑123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272‑4944(02)00109‑3
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207‑228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev‑publhealth‑032013‑182443
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169‑182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272‑4944(95)90001‑2
Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (Eds.). (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.
Keniger, L. E., Gaston, K. J., Irvine, K. N., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(3), 913‑935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913
Lin, W., Jin, H., Zeng, C., Yao, T., Zhu, X., & Qin, X. (2025). A preliminary study on the research system of nature‑healing perception. Garden, 42(6), 64‑72.
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503‑515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
Peng, H., Li, C., Zhong, S., & Zhang, J. (2023). Human‑nature relationship research: Contact, connectedness, and benefits. Geographical Research, 42(4), 1101‑1116.
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420‑421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201‑230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272‑4944(05)80184‑7
Wang, Y. (2022). The healing value of natural beauty: On the aesthetic deficiency in forest therapy. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences, 43(4), 132‑137.
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
Zeng, F. (2010). Introduction to ecological aesthetics. The Commercial Press.
Zhu, J. (2024). Healing through nature: On the transformative expression of natural imagery in artistic creation (Master’s thesis). Central Academy of Fine Arts.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.