Exploring Pathways for Academic Libraries’ Participation in Cultural Heritage Digital Dissemination: An Artistic Resource- Centered Approach

Keywords

Academic libraries; cultural heritage; digital dissemination; artistic resources; digital humanities

How to Cite

Exploring Pathways for Academic Libraries’ Participation in Cultural Heritage Digital Dissemination: An Artistic Resource- Centered Approach. (2026). Journal of Global Arts Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.23112/1ps0x117

Abstract

Background: The implementation of China’s National Cultural Digitization Strategy has made the digital dissemination of cultural heritage an important approach to cultural preservation, public engagement, and cultural value communication. Academic libraries have abundant artistic resources and digital infrastructures that provide unique advantages for contributing in this process. Purpose: This study explores the foundations, challenges, and implementation pathways of academic libraries in cultural heritage digital dissemination from an artistic resource‑centered perspective. Methods: Drawing upon Lasswell’s 5W Communication Theory, this study employs literature analysis and typical case illustrations to examine existing practices and construct a theoretical framework for cultural heritage digital dissemination in academic libraries. Results: The findings indicate that academic libraries benefit from strengths in artistic resource accumulation, digital platform development, and interdisciplinary collaboration. However, they continue to face challenges including resource fragmentation, content discontinuity, limited dissemination channels, insufficient public participation, and inadequate evaluation mechanisms. To address these issues, a five‑dimensional implementation framework is proposed, comprising artistic resource integration, digital storytelling, multi‑platform dissemination, public participation enhancement, and dissemination evaluation. Conclusion: Academic libraries should gradually transform from resource management institutions into active agents of cultural communication and knowledge services. By strengthening resource integration, communication innovation, public engagement, and dissemination evaluation, they can play a more significant role in promoting the preservation, dissemination, and value creation of cultural heritage in the digital age.

References

Aboelmaged, M., Mouakket, S., & Ali, I. (2024). A scientometric analysis of digital library adoption over the past 30 years: Models, trends, and research directions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 56(3), 809–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231161143

Berry, D. M. (2012). Understanding digital humanities. Palgrave Macmillan.

General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee & General Office of the State Council. (2022). Opinions on promoting the implementation of the National Cultural Digitization Strategy.

Giaccardi, E. (Ed.). (2012). Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture. Routledge.

Harisanty, D., Obille, K. L. B., Anna, N. E. V., Purwanti, E., & Retrialisca, F. (2024). Cultural heritage preservation in the digital age: Harnessing artificial intelligence for the future: A bibliometric analysis. Digital Library Perspectives, 40(4), 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-01-2024-0018

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

Jin, P., & Liu, Y. (2022). Fluid space: Digitisation of cultural heritage and its media dissemination. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 8, 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100022

Ju, J. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence empowering the digital construction of red literature resources in libraries: Logical mechanisms, value dimensions, and promotion strategies. Library Work and Study, (2), 89–96.

Kalota, F., Boamah, B. F., Allam, H., Schisler, T., & Witty, G. (2025). Beyond books: Student perspectives on emerging technologies, usability, and ethics in the library of the future. Publications, 13(3), Article 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13030032

Kautonen, H., & Gasparini, A. A. (2024). B‑wheel: Building AI competences in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(4), 102886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102886

Klinke, H. (2020). The digital transformation of art history. In K. Brown (Ed.), The Routledge companion to digital humanities and art history (pp. 511–524). Routledge.

Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). Harper & Brothers.

Li, Z. Y., & Long, H. P. (2024). Research on the aggregation service model of red literature resources from the perspective of the metaverse. Information Science, 42(7), 97–104.

Luther, W., Baloian, N., Biella, D., & Sacher, D. (2023). Digital twins and enabling technologies in museums and cultural heritage: An overview. Sensors, 23(3), Article 1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031583

McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). Sage.

Parry, R. (2007). Recoding the museum: Digital heritage and the technologies of change. Routledge.

Presner, T. (2010). Digital humanities 2.0: A report on knowledge. CiteSeerX.

Simon, N. (2010). The participatory museum. Museum 2.0.

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.

Tang, Y. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of cultural heritage visualisation research. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1124. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599‑024‑03567‑4

Terras, M., Nyhan, J., & Vanhoutte, E. (Eds.). (2013). Defining digital humanities: A reader. Ashgate.

Theodoropoulos, A., & Antoniou, A. (2022). VR games in cultural heritage: A systematic review of the emerging fields of virtual reality and culture games. Applied Sciences, 12(17), Article 8476. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178476

UNESCO. (2003). Charter on the preservation of digital heritage. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Wang, L. (2022). Value mining of university red‑themed special collections: A case study of Fudan University Library. Journal of Academic Libraries, 40(1), 97–101.

Williams, D. J. (2023). Digital initiatives in academic libraries: Challenges and opportunities. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 23(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.0019

Wu, S., He, L., Yang, H. L., et al. (2024). Constructing a metadata representation system for red literature from the perspective of transfer learning. Information and Documentation Services, (6), 84–92.

Xu, X. J., Sun, A. H., Shi, R. J., et al. (2023). Knowledge ontology construction and application of western Anhui red literature from the perspective of digital humanities. Library Tribune, 43(10), 139–151.

Yang, H., Li, L. L., & Mo, X. X. (2022). Research on the development trend of red literature resource construction from the perspective of resource integration. Library and Information Service, 66(14), 58–66.

Zhang, C. R., & Wang, K. (2021). Research on image‑based reading promotion models in academic libraries: Based on a survey of 42 “Double First‑Class” university libraries in China. Journal of Academic Libraries, 39(3), 83–90.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.