Abstract
Background: With the growth of mobile internet and social media, 'storytelling advertising' is a key brand strategy, leading to budget increases for narrative-capable digital and video scenarios. As an artistic narrative form, it blends visual symbols, aesthetics, and creative plots to offer a unique aesthetic experience. Existing studies confirm it affects consumer decisions via emotional resonance, but the symbolic meaning construction remains underexplored. Since Zaltman (2003) noted 95% of purchase decisions are subconscious, emotion's leading role in consumer decisions is critical. Objective: From the symbolic interactionism perspective, this study explores the dual-mediation mechanism (emotional resonance, brand identification) through which advertising artistic narratives influence consumers’ purchase intention, and quantifies the two paths’ effect strength. Methods: Based on symbolic interactionism and narrative transportation theory, we developed the model "artistic narrative→emotional resonance/brand identification→purchase intention"; We surveyed 450 Chinese young consumers (18-30, purchasing power; 90% valid), using a 5-point Likert scale to measure artistic narrative features (narrativity, interactivity, emotional appeal), emotional resonance, brand identification and purchase intention. Hypotheses were tested via SEM with 5,000-sample Bootstrap. Results: Narrativity, interactivity and emotional appeal all positively influence emotional resonance; emotional appeal has the strongest impact on brand identification. Both mediators positively affect purchase intention, with emotional resonance’s mediating effect significantly stronger than brand identification’s. Conclusion: Emotional resonance is the key pathway for artistic narratives to drive purchase intention, with brand identification as a support. This study extends symbolic interactionism to advertising artistic symbol construction, guiding scenario-specific, artistically engaging ad design. Limited to Chinese youth, future research could expand to cross-cultural/elderly samples and explore effects of different artistic styles and media carriers.
References
BAGOZZI, R. P., GOPINATH, M., & NYER, P. (1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 184-206. DOI: 10.1177/0092070399272006.
BLUMER, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/California/9780520022278.001.0001.
DODDS, W. B., MONROE, K. B., & GREWAL, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319. DOI: 10.1177/002224379102800306.
ESCALAS, J. E. (2004). Imagining yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(4), 501–514. DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.2004.41.4.501.
GREEN, M. C., & BROCK, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701.
HOLT, D. B. (2002). Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 70–90. DOI: 10.1086/341694.
LEVY, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117–124. URL: [https://hbr.org/1959/07/symbols-for-sale](https://hbr.org/1959/07/symbols-for-sale).
LUNDQVIST, A., LILJANDER, V., GUMMERUS, J., & VAN RIEL, A. (2013). The impact of storytelling on the consumer brand experience: The case of a firm-originated story. Journal of Brand Management, 20(4), 283–297. DOI: 10.1057/bm.2012.32.
MAEL, F., & ASHFORTH, S. P. (1992). Alumni and sport team identification: A further examination of the question of the self. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 16(2), 103–123. DOI: 10.1177/0193723592016002005.
MEAD, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226510636.001.0001.
SOLOMON, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 319–329. DOI: 10.1086/208719.
VAN LAER, T., DE RUYTER, K., VISCONTI, L. M., & WETZELS, M. (2014). The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797–817. DOI: 10.1086/675880.
ZALTMAN, G. (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market. Harvard Business School Press. DOI: 10.1591/9781613690085.001.0001.
Yao, Xi, & Yao, Jun. (2024). Symbolic Interaction: The Construction of Social Identity in Brand Digital Communication. Journalism and Communication Theory Research, 77(4), 96–107.
Zhu, Zhenzhong, Liu, Fu, & Chen, Haopeng. (2020). Ability or Passion? The Influence of Advertising Appeals on Consumer Brand Identification and Purchase Intention. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(3), 357–370. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00357.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Journal of Global Arts Studies.
